← Taiwan Stock Snapshot Database
Home / Indicator library / Insider and mega-holder ownership levels
Ownership levels

Insider and mega-holder ownership levels

What the board actually holds, month by month, drawn against the share of the float sitting in accounts over a thousand lots. Taiwan requires directors and supervisors to file their combined holding and their pledge ratio every month — a running level, not a stream of transactions, which is something most markets do not publish at all.

Try it

Solid dark line is the monthly insider holding ratio, gold is the weekly mega-holder ratio, and the dashed red line is the pledge ratio on the right axis. Drag the zoom bar to narrow the window. The free tier covers the demo ticker 2330.

GET /v1/indicator/insider-holdings/{stock_id}
What we publish is data and tooling — not investment advice, not stock picks, and no promise of returns. Every figure is either an official public source reproduced as published, or a derivation we document well enough for you to recompute it. What you trade on it is your call. Ownership ratios describe the distribution of the float. They are not a statement about direction.

How it is built

Two official filings on two different cadences, plus one denominator that has to be handled honestly. The fourth step is the one worth reading.

01

Directors file their holdings every month

Every listed company reports the combined shareholding of its whole board of directors and supervisors on a monthly cycle, together with the share of that holding which has been pledged as loan collateral. Both figures are taken as filed. Most markets have no monthly equivalent — insider disclosure elsewhere is usually event driven, so you see transactions but never a running level.

02

Mega-holder share comes from the weekly depository breakdown

The central depository publishes a weekly distribution of every ticker's holders by size band. The share held by accounts sitting on 1,000 lots or more is what is plotted here as the mega-holder line. It carries both a data date and the date it became publicly available, and the coverage note under the chart states the window actually returned rather than implying the series runs the full history.

03

Two clocks on one axis, neither resampled

The insider line is monthly, the mega-holder line weekly. They are drawn on a shared time axis without upsampling the slower one or smoothing the faster one. Insiders and large accounts pulling back at the same time is a different reading from either moving alone, and that is only visible if both keep their own cadence.

04

The denominator is derived, and says so

Holding percentage needs a share count outstanding. Where the filed figure is not available the count is backed out from the official market-capitalisation panel divided by the same day's close, which is an approximation rather than a filed number. The numerator — shares held, and the pledge ratio — is always the filed value. Which of the two denominators was used on a given call is printed with the result, because a percentage whose denominator is estimated deserves to be read differently from one whose denominator is filed.

Terms

Four words carry this page:

Insider holding ratioboard and supervisors, combined
In short: the share of the company held by its own directors and supervisors as a group. It is the most direct read on how much of their own money the people running the company have in it. A long steady decline while the stock rises is the pattern most readers come to this page looking for.
Mega holderaccounts over 1,000 lots
In short: a holder sitting on more than 1,000 lots — a million shares. Their combined share is used as a proxy for whether the float is drifting toward large accounts or away from them. The filing gives the ratio and nothing about who those accounts belong to.
Pledge ratioshares posted as loan collateral
In short: the portion of insider holdings that has been pledged to borrow against. A high ratio means personal leverage sitting behind the position, and a sharp fall in the price can force it to be topped up or sold. Pledging is legal and routine, so the level matters more than its existence.
Level versus eventtwo views of the same question
In short: this page reads the stock of holdings — how the water level moved. The cross-source ownership timeline reads the flow — which filing landed on which day. A level chart tells you the drift happened; the event timeline tells you when it became knowable.

Where the line is

This page reports levels that were filed. It does not report intent. A board whose combined holding fell six points over two years did hold less at the end of it — but whether that came from selling, from transfers, from dilution, or from a single director leaving is not in the monthly filing, and the honest version of this chart cannot tell you. The cross-source ownership timeline goes one layer closer to that question by putting the individual transfer filings on a date axis, and it still stops short of outcomes, because a pre-declaration is an intention rather than a completed sale.

The mega-holder line has a matching limit. It is a ratio with no identities attached, so the accounts behind it on two different dates need not be the same people. Rising concentration is a fact about the distribution of the float and not evidence about who is accumulating. Neither line here was chosen, smoothed or thresholded by checking which version would have lined up best with subsequent returns.

FAQ

What does a falling insider holding ratio tell me?

That the combined position of the board shrank over that stretch, and nothing about why. Shares can leave an insider position through a sale, a transfer, an estate, or dilution that leaves the share count unchanged while the total grows. The filing carries the level, not the reason. Reading a decline directly as insiders losing faith is adding something the disclosure does not contain.

Why does the mega-holder line start much later than the insider line?

Because the two come from different filings with different histories. The monthly insider series on a long-listed company can reach back to the late 1990s, while the weekly depository distribution used here begins in 2019. The coverage note under the chart prints the actual window returned for each of the two, so the gap is stated rather than hidden by a line that quietly begins mid-chart.

Is the holding percentage exact?

The share count on top is filed and exact. The denominator may be derived from the official market-cap panel rather than filed, and the current share count is applied across the whole history, so a company that issued a lot of stock over the years will show early percentages that are approximate. The footnote under the chart states which denominator was used. If you need exactness on a historical date, read the share count rather than the percentage.

Why does the pledge ratio sit on its own axis?

Because it is a share of the insider position, not a share of the company, and the two typically live on very different scales. Plotting a 40 percent pledge ratio against a 5 percent holding ratio on one axis would flatten the line that most readers came for. The right axis is labelled and the dashed line is the pledge series.

Do I need a paid tier?

The demo ticker (2330) runs the full chart with no signup. Arbitrary tickers are a paid tier, as is as-of history across the whole universe. The chart, the coverage note and the derivation footnote are identical either way — the paid tier widens coverage, it does not unlock a different number.

Run it yourself

The free tier needs no signup — call this feature's API straight away with the demo key. Unlock as-of history and full ticker coverage on a paid tier.